Asset managers commit to executive pay engagement following LGIM's decision to end feedback

Prioritisation is important

Kathleen Gallagher
clock • 4 min read

Large asset managers have continued to campaign on executive pay despite Legal & General Investment Management’s (LGIM) decision to no longer consult on renumeration and instead focus on its “wider ESG work”. Commentators have acknowledged the need to prioritise stewardship activities, but noted that renumeration remains an important area of discussion.

Last month the Financial Times saw a letter in which Legal & General noted that, for over a decade, its asset management arm has responded to companies consulting with the firm about proposed changes to executive pay. "History has shown us that a majority of companies do not act on the feedback we provide to these remuneration consultations," the letter said. Investment Week approached large asset managers, including abrdn, Aviva Investors, Columbia Threadneedle and Schroders, all of which said they would continue to engage on renumeration. Nathan Leclerq, head of corporate governa...

To continue reading this article...

Join Investment Week for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, analysis and opinion from the investment industry, including the Sustainable Hub covering fund news from the ESG space
  • Get ahead of regulatory and technological changes affecting fund management
  • Important and breaking news stories selected by the editors delivered straight to your inbox each day
  • Weekly members-only newsletter with exclusive opinion pieces from leading industry experts
  • Be the first to hear about our extensive events schedule and awards programmes

Join now

 

Already an Investment Week
member?

Login

More on ESG

Neil Brown (pictured), is co-portfolio manager of the PGIM Jennison Carbon Solutions Equity fund
ESG

PGIM: Why today's narrow approach to decarbonisation is flawed

Dive deeper into solutions

Neil Brown
clock 05 January 2024 • 5 min read
The industry group praised the transparency introduced by SFDR, but said the de facto labelling regime had 'stretched it beyond its original intentions and not always been helpful'.
ESG

EFAMA calls for major reforms to SFDR labelling regime

SFDR has 'not always been helpful'

Elliot Gulliver-Needham
clock 22 December 2023 • 2 min read
The board of AERI noted this morning’s statement and confirmed the 'unsolicited proposals'.
ESG

Octopus Renewables trust makes bid for Aquila European Renewables

Multiple attempts over 2023

James Baxter-Derrington
clock 22 December 2023 • 2 min read
Trustpilot